![crimes committed by muslims crimes committed by muslims](https://media.local10.com/photo/2017/12/22/Beating20171223001002_11332254_ver1.0_1280_720.jpg)
![crimes committed by muslims crimes committed by muslims](https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/06/12/us/12hatecrime-01/merlin_156294216_ac398bb1-5b77-4162-a215-647e7897f391-superJumbo.jpg)
The Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka and Colombia’s “narcoterrorists” blow up civilians and have nothing to do with Islam. Even now, Islamists are by no means the sole perpetrators. Rewind fifty or a hundred years and it was communists, anarchists, fascists, and others who thought than any means justified their glorious ends.
![crimes committed by muslims crimes committed by muslims](https://www.catholic.org/files/images/media/2014/08/08/14075270411961_700.jpg)
So, all that would seem to suggest Islam is more violent, right? In other words, even when we define both “terrorism” and “Islamist” restrictively, thereby limiting the number of incidents and casualties that can be blamed on Islamists, Islamists come out as the prime culprits. I also use a restrictive definition of “Islamist” and classify attacks by Chechen separatists as ethnonational rather than Islamist terrorism. I exclude from the data all terrorist incidents that occurred in Iraq after the American invasion, and I consider attacks on occupying military forces anywhere to be guerilla resistance, not terrorism.
Crimes committed by muslims full#
The headlines in the past months have been full of Islamist-fueled violence, such as ISIS killing its hostages, the attacks on Charlie Hebdo in Paris, and yesterday’s attack on a Copenhagen café.Īnd a cursory look at the data shows that from 1994-2008, I found that 204 high-casualty terrorist bombings occurred worldwide and that Islamists were responsible for 125, or 61 percent, of these incidents, accounting for 70 percent of all deaths. And indeed, global terrorism today is disproportionately an Islamist phenomenon, as I show in my recent book. This article was amended on 30 November 2021 to correct the spelling of Tun Khin’s last name.There is a widely held belief in the United States today that Islam is a religion that goads its followers to violence. He added: “The decision in Argentina shows that there is nowhere to hide for those who commit genocide – the world stands firmly united against these abhorrent crimes.” The president of BROUK, Tun Khin, said in a statement the ruling represented hope “not just for us Rohingya but for oppressed people everywhere”. In their decision, the appeals judges said that “the investigation and eventual judgment of this type of crime is the primary responsibility of states”. One of the complainants said they “had all been sexually assaulted and that many of their family members had died as a result of the repression they had suffered” in August 2017, the court recalled. Six Rohingya women, refugees in Bangladesh, had given remote testimony to the court in Argentina. Proceedings against Myanmar and its leaders are already under way at the international criminal court and the UN’s international court of justice. The legal premise of “universal justice” holds that some acts – including war crimes and crimes against humanity – are so horrific they are not specific to one nation and can be tried anywhere.Īrgentina’s courts have taken up other universal jurisdiction cases in the past, including in relation to ex-dictator Francisco Franco’s rule in Spain and the Falun Gong movement in China. A 2017 army crackdown on Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, which the UN says could amount to genocide, has triggered an exodus of more than 740,000 members of the community, mainly to Bangladesh.